The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the most recent Nobel Peace Prize recipient from Venezuela have expressed contrasting opinions on the recent deadly U.S. attacks on suspected drug-carrying vessels. These attacks, which began on September 2, have resulted in the deaths of at least 61 individuals and the survival of two. The initial strikes occurred near Venezuela and Trinidad and Tobago, known as transshipment points for drug trafficking.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has disclosed that additional strikes have occurred in the eastern Pacific Ocean. The Trump administration, in compliance with the War Powers Act, has informed Congress that the military is engaged in a “non-international armed conflict,” labeling those aboard the drug-carrying boats as enemy combatants. The administration has cited the significant number of drug-related deaths in the U.S. and accuses the Cartel de los Soles of being a terrorist organization linked to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
President Donald Trump mentioned that covert CIA operations have been authorized in Venezuela, potentially extending to land operations. However, there is a lack of information regarding the deceased individuals and the contents of the cargo on board. Survivors of the attacks, such as Andrés Fernando Tufiño Chila from Ecuador and Jeison Obando Pérez from Colombia, have faced legal and health challenges following the strikes.
The U.S. strikes have sparked mixed reactions, with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Colombian President Gustavo Petro condemning the actions. There are concerns about the legality and implications of the attacks, with international human rights organizations calling for investigations into the use of lethal force. Legal experts have raised questions about the justification and legal basis for the strikes.
Amidst the controversy, the U.S. Senate is set to vote on a war powers resolution that would restrict strikes near Venezuela. While reports suggest the possibility of further strikes within Venezuela, President Trump has denied considering such actions. The situation remains contentious, with implications for international law and diplomatic relations in the region.